Skip to content

Washington Travel Clinic v. Kandrac

Post categories

  1. Libel and Privacy
The Washington Travel Clinic and a doctor sued Yelp reviewer John Kandrac for libel for statements he made about his…

The Washington Travel Clinic and a doctor sued Yelp reviewer John Kandrac for libel for statements he made about his poor experience at the clinic. Kandrac moved to dismiss the complaint under the D.C. anti-SLAPP statute. The D.C. Superior Court dismissed almost all of his claims, but allowed one to survive. At issue in this filing was whether the denial of a special motion to dismiss under the D.C. anti-SLAPP statute is immediately appealable under the “collateral order doctrine.” The Reporters Committee argued that a special motion to dismiss under the D.C. anti-SLAPP statute is immediately appealable. Allowing for immediate appeal in such a case furthers the purposes of the anti-SLAPP statute, which is designed to allow journalists to quickly dispose of meritless suits designed to chill speech. Numerous other jurisdictions have found that the rights conferred by an anti-SLAPP statute will be irreparably lost if orders denying anti-SLAPP motions are not immediately appealable.

Washington Travel Clinic v. Kandrac

Stay informed by signing up for our mailing list

Keep up with our work by signing up to receive our monthly newsletter. We'll send you updates about the cases we're doing with journalists, news organizations, and documentary filmmakers working to keep you informed.