In re Search Warrant dated November 5, 2021
Case Number: 21 MAG 10685
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Client: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Request to Unseal Filed: Nov. 15, 2021
Background: On Nov. 5, 2021, a federal magistrate judge for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a search warrant permitting the government to seize and extract information from cell phones found in the home of James O’Keefe, founder of Project Veritas. Federal authorities executed the search warrant the next day.
On Nov. 15, 2021, Reporters Committee attorneys filed a motion to unseal the search warrant application, supporting affidavit and other judicial documents related to law enforcement’s search of O’Keefe’s home.
Quote: “The public and the press have a strong interest in access to these materials, which should provide information about the government’s justification for the search,” Bruce Brown, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said in a statement.
Update: On Dec. 7, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York denied the Reporters Committee’s motion to unseal the search warrant materials. The Reporters Committee filed objections to the court’s opinion and order on Dec. 20, arguing that the magistrate judge erred in concluding that the materials underlying the search warrant have to remain sealed in their entirety, without an end date. Reporters Committee attorneys also argued that the magistrate judge erred in holding that the public has no right under the First Amendment to view the materials underlying the government’s application for a warrant. On April 16, 2024, District Judge Analisa Torres largely overruled the Reporters Committee’s objections to the magistrate judge’s order, concluding in part that the immediate unsealing of the search warrant materials would pose too great a risk to the government’s ongoing investigation. However, the judge held that the unsealing of the records is warranted after the government closes its investigation.
Filings:
2021-11-15: Motion to unseal
2021-11-19: Government’s response to Reporters Committee motion to unseal
2021-11-23: Reporters Committee reply in support of unsealing
2021-12-07: Opinion and order
2021-12-20: Reporters Committee’s objections to the magistrate judge’s opinion and order
2022-01-03: Government’s response to Reporters Committee’s objections
2022-01-05: Reporters Committee’s letter in support of objections
2022-05-13: ACLU amicus letter in support of Reporters Committee’s objections
2022-05-24: Order instructing government to respond to Reporters Committee’s objections and ACLU’s amicus letter
2022-06-08: Reporters Committee’s motion for leave to reply
2022-06-08: Order granting in part Reporters Committee’s motion for leave to reply
2022-06-24: Government’s response to Reporters Committee’s objections and ACLU’s letter
2022-07-01: Reporters Committee’s reply
2022-08-26: Reporters Committee’s letter regarding guilty pleas
2024-04-16: Order