Search results for: Nuance

Bills introduced in the Florida House and Senate would harm public interest journalism.

The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh.

RCFP's Gabe Rottman argues that a House subcommittee should drop subpoenas it issued to large tech platforms last week.

Most recently, the Fourth Circuit found that “livestreaming a police traffic stop is speech protected by the First Amendment."

The right of access to court documents does not depend on the concreteness of the requester’s planned use for them.

The Supreme Court asked the solicitor general to weigh in on whether it should hear the social media cases.

The ruling comes a month after the AP, represented by an RCFP attorney, intervened to bring transparency to the case.

A case before the U.S. Supreme Court could transform the internet and have major implications for journalists.

An episode in the Nixon administration’s efforts to influence network news coverage offers eerie echoes of anti-tech proposals today.

Here's what to expect from RCFP's Technology and Press Freedom Project team in 2023.